Rome Changes Strategy… and Another Storm
The year 254 BCE proved to be a good year for Rome, despite suffering from a cataclysmic storm that sank over 250 warships in the prior campaigning season. Panormus had fallen from good strategic combined arms use of the army and navy. This had been one of Carthage’s strongest possessions in Sicily. Only Lilybaeum and Drepana remained as formidable strongholds, with a few other small possessions. One would think that Rome would continue on and try to capture these last settlements in the same manner as the successful campaign against Panormus. However, you would be wrong as Rome didn’t do much to match the strategy of 254 in the next campaigning season.
The Not So New Strategy
Instead, in the place of taking Carthaginian cities in Sicily, the official strategy appears to have been to once again use the fleet to attack Carthage’s African possessions despite all that occurred in 255. Polybius describes that the raiding that Blaesus did was “nothing of importance” (1.39)2 until they reached the island of Meninx. (Though he did celebrate a triumph so he must have done something in Africa.) This is the modern day Djerba and would have been over three hundred miles south of the city of Carthage. Interestingly, this large island was known in antiquity as the island where the lotus-eaters dwelt that Odysseus stumbled into on his journey. However, instead of finding peace and tranquility that Odysseus’ men did, the Romans ran into disaster at Meninx.
The Romans Are Not Masters of the Sea
It was off this island that the relatively novice Roman seafarers showed how green they were upon new waters. Polybius describes the situation. “Owing to their ignorance of these seas, they ran on to some shoals, and, on the tide retreating and the ships grounding fast, they were in a most difficult position.” (1.39)3 Diodorus Siculus also implies that Carthaginian ships may have also been present, making the situation even stickier for the Romans. Eventually, they managed to unground their ships through a combination of jettisoning much of the cargo on the ships and the tide rising back up again. As soon as they were able to, the Roman fleet bailed out of African waters and back to Sicily.
This demonstrates that, while Rome was victorious largely so far in naval battles, they did not yet have mastery over the sea. The Romans also did hold complete naval supremacy over Carthage either, as an incident in the previous year reveals otherwise. After the successful capture of Panormus, the ransom money and victory spoils were sent to Rome. However, “the Carthaginians kept watch for their ships homeward bound, and captured several that were full of money.” (Zonaras 8.14)4 Clearly, even though Rome had the largest fleet, skilled Carthaginian captains and ships had to be reckoned with. These successful Carthaginian pirating raids also don’t seem to be part of the fleet assembling at Carthage which may further indicate that Carthage had naval spread out among her naval bases in the western Mediterranean. Perhaps these ones were operating out of the Lipari Islands.
When we return, we will see Rome largely abandon naval affairs and the First Punic War once again turns into a contest for Sicily.
- Cassius Dio and Zonaras. Roman History. Translated by Earnest Cary. 1914.
- Polybius. The Histories. Translated by W. R. Paton. 1922.
- Ibid.
- Cassius Dio and Zonaras. Roman History. Translated by Earnest Cary. 1914.
- Diodorus Siculus. Library of History. Translated by Francis Walton. 1957.